What the EU Council decided on the Migration and Asylum Pact and when it will enter into force

This is what the agreement between the twenty-seven European interior ministers on the two main aspects of the Migration and Asylum Pact provides for.
european migration act

An agreement found on a razor’s edge, after a day of leaps forward of the most favourable, braking of the most sceptical and compromises in order not to reach an all-out failure of the 27 on two key dossiers of the Migration and Asylum Pact.

Migration and asylum pact: what was agreed

With regard to the agreement on the two Migration and Asylum Pact Regulations, the main points concern the different aspects of the ‘central pivot of migration management’. I.e. the balance between solidarity and responsibility in migration management on the part of all Twenty-Seven.

The first concept was mainly addressed in the Regulation for the Management of Asylum and Migration (Ramm). Which introduces a compulsory solidarity mechanism. All member states will have to contribute. But, with a choice between relocations and a financial contribution of 20,000 euros per unaccepted migrant.

These funds ‘will flow into an instrument that will be defined by the Commission, the details not yet defined’, the Swedish minister said.

At the basis of the solidarity mechanism will be the minimum annual number of relocations, set at 30,000 people. Although “it may be increased if necessary and account will be taken of situations where there is no need for solidarity in a given year”.

Furthermore, the regulation establishes the obligation to apply in the Member State of first entry and discourages secondary movements. This, by limiting the possibilities of cessation or transfer of responsibility between member states.

Read also: Migrants’ boat shipwreck in Greece, the worst disaster at sea ever: the victims may be 600

The other details

The other details of the understanding concern the concept of safe third countries, the connection criterion and the (lack of) exemptions for families with minors from the border procedure.

On the first and second aspect, the Swedish presidency clarified that ‘the criterion of connection between the applicant and the third country remains, but it is up to the Member State to assess’ whether the destination is safe.

Although for the moment ‘there is still no list of safe third states’, added Minister Malmer Stenergard. No less delicate was the compromise on which Germany was persuaded to vote in favour of the proposal on the two rows of the Migration and Asylum Pact.

Thus, the exemption of families with children under the age of 12 from the border procedure did not appear in the text of the compromise in the end.

But “Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg and Portugal nevertheless point out that the exemption on minors is particularly important. And will have to be taken forward in the trialogues”, made it clear by German Minister Nancy Faeser.

Read also: How the European Union’s highly complex migration policy works and why it is back at the top of the political agenda

Related articles...
Latest news
Newton Group cutting-edge human-based technology for more than twenty years

Newton Group: cutting-edge human-based technology for more than twenty years

who is jd vance

Who is J.D. Vance, newly appointed Vice President for Donald Trump: life, career and political vision

boom us tech stock titles

Boom in US technology stocks: a new bubble incoming?

how much do us and other member countries spend on nato

NATO: how much do the U.S. and other member nations spend on it

record houses suing ai

Record companies are suing Artificial Intelligence: here is why

what is glamping most spectacular places around the world

Glamping: 10 of the most spectacular destinations around the world


Sign up now to stay updated on all business topics.